<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Popular, personal and public data: Article-level metrics at PLoS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://duncan.hull.name/2009/09/18/plos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://duncan.hull.name/2009/09/18/plos/</link>
	<description>A personal laboratory notebook</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:01:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LabGrab</title>
		<link>http://duncan.hull.name/2009/09/18/plos/#comment-3546</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LabGrab]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://duncan.hull.name/?p=2384#comment-3546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In asking researchers if they thought there was a benefit to getting reprinted or republished most of them felt that getting into an accredited peer reviewed was the main requirement and republishing or the &quot;eyeballs&quot; their work got wasn&#039;t on the radar as much simply because of the status quo.  Said simply getting wider exposure wasn&#039;t as interesting as being seen by the right people.  To me both need to occur and statistics and readership will just gain in importance moving forward.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In asking researchers if they thought there was a benefit to getting reprinted or republished most of them felt that getting into an accredited peer reviewed was the main requirement and republishing or the &#8220;eyeballs&#8221; their work got wasn&#8217;t on the radar as much simply because of the status quo.  Said simply getting wider exposure wasn&#8217;t as interesting as being seen by the right people.  To me both need to occur and statistics and readership will just gain in importance moving forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

