Fantasy Science Funding is a fun game that anybody can play. You select a Science funding body of your choice, imagine yourself as its all powerful chief executive, and decide which areas of scientific research you would “hire and fire”. What could be easier? Here is how Fantasy Science Funding works…
August 14, 2008
Anyone for a game of Fantasy Science Funding?
7 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
O'Really? 
[…] Fantasy Science Funding is a fun game that anybody can play. You select a Science funding body of your choice, imagine yourself as its all powerful chief executive, and decide which areas of scientific research you would “hire and fire”. What could be easier? Here is how it works… Source: Anyone for a game of Fantasy Science Funding? […]
Pingback by Donald Trump | Anyone for a game of Fantasy Science Funding? — August 15, 2008 @ 2:47 pm |
I really do hate his hair!
Comment by Fisherp — August 19, 2008 @ 3:18 pm |
Is it real hair or fantasy hair? Difficult to tell.
Comment by Duncan — August 19, 2008 @ 9:15 pm |
[…] grant proposals but will try to put some ideas in another post which is long overdue in response to a promise to Duncan […]
Pingback by Science in the open » What is the cost of peer review? Can we afford (not to have) high impact journals? — March 3, 2009 @ 5:08 pm |
[…] and a response to Duncan Hull’s post of nine or so months ago proposing a game of “Fantasy Science Funding“. The game requires you to describe how you would distribute the funding of the BBSRC if you […]
Pingback by Science in the open » Fantasy Science Funding: How do we get peer review of grant proposals to scale? — March 12, 2009 @ 4:06 pm |
[…] and a response to Duncan Hull’s post of nine or so months ago proposing a game of “Fantasy Science Funding“. The game requires you to describe how you would distribute the funding of the BBSRC if you […]
Pingback by CameronNeylon.Net » Blog Archive » Fantasy Science Funding: How do we get peer review of grant proposals to scale? — December 30, 2009 @ 4:30 pm |
[…] grant proposals but will try to put some ideas in another post which is long overdue in response to a promise to Duncan Hull] (No Ratings Yet) Loading […]
Pingback by Science in the Open » Blog Archive » What is the cost of peer review? Can we afford (not to have) high impact journals? — February 16, 2010 @ 2:12 pm |